HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Henriksen, L Articles by Fortmann, S P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Henriksen, L Articles by Fortmann, S P

Young adults' opinions of Philip Morris and its television advertising

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Lisa Henriksen, PhD, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1000 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA;
lhenriksen{at}stanford.edu

Objective: To determine what young people think about the tobacco company Philip Morris and how it affects their evaluations of the company's new television advertising.

Design: Data were gathered in the context of a controlled experiment in which participants saw four Philip Morris ads about youth smoking prevention, four Philip Morris ads about charitable works, or four Anheuser-Busch ads about preventing underage drinking (the control group). Knowledge and opinion of Philip Morris were measured before ad exposure.

Setting: A California state university in the San Francisco Bay area.

Subjects: A convenience sample of undergraduates (n = 218) aged 18–25 years.

Main outcome measures: Advertising evaluation measured by 12 semantic differential scales.

Results: A little more than half of the students knew that Philip Morris is a tobacco company. Neither this knowledge nor students' smoking status was related to their opinion of the company. Philip Morris ads were rated less favourably by students who were aware that the sponsor is a tobacco company than by students who were unaware.

Conclusions: Advertisements designed to discredit the tobacco industry typically avoid references to specific companies. This study suggests that such counter-advertising would benefit from teaching audiences about the industry's corporate identities.

Keywords: tobacco industry; mass media, counter-advertising; adolescents; smoking prevention

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Szczypka, M. A Wakefield, S. Emery, Y. M Terry-McElrath, B. R Flay, and F. J Chaloupka Working to make an image: an analysis of three Philip Morris corporate image media campaigns Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 344 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wakefield, K. McLeod, and C. L Perry "Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv44 - iv53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]